Introduction
“Which is the best D&D adventure ever?” is a good, and
fun, question. But what might, in one specific sense, be an even better
question is this: who is the best D&D adventure designer ever? When we
consider composers and novelists, individual pieces or novels may be our
favourites, but there is something to be learned from looking at bodies of
work. Which writers are consistently good? What characterizes consistent
writers (at least in terms of their “visible remains”)?
Some definitions and qualifications and exclusions. I’m
looking at three qualities in the careers of these designers: the BREADTH of
their good work (how many good adventures?), the ORIGINALITY of their good work
(how trailblazing?), and the DEPTH of their good work (how interesting and distinctive
and finessed?). I’m excluding non-adventures for clarity’s sake – that is, I am
excluding modules which may include “adventure material” but are not developed
environments to sit down and play sessions with. This doesn’t negatively affect
many of the great designers, honestly – very few made their bones on
non-adventure material. The only one who comes to mind is Ed Greenwood, whose
best material comes from his old magazine column about monsters and from the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (1st
Edition) and FR1 Waterdeep and the
North (his best adventure is in Dragon
#95). Finally, I will include a number of “3rd party writers” on
this list – though I cannot pretend to have exhausted Judge’s Guild, Role Aids,
the New Old School, and so forth.
I somehow feel obliged to salute the many writers who wrote,
particularly, for TSR, who will not appear here in any other context – Rolston and
Allston and Rabe and Grubb and Findley and Hammack and Rasmussen and the rest.
A lot of writers contributed something worthwhile over time – even if it’s just
a strangely excellent adventure in Dragon,
and nothing more (Sid Fisher, take a bow!) – and even in the comparative
hackwork of the mid and late 80s, there was real effort made. Nonetheless, only
a few ascend to compete in my rankings.
Honourable Mentions
It’s tempting to give honourable mentions to just about every adventure designer who’s written anything I’ve liked. A number of excellent OSR designers fall short of this list by dint of small output (being normal people with busy lives), rather than by lack of quality. But who makes the “long list”?
Of the Old School itself, the most obvious candidates are
the sub-Gygaxian mainstays – Douglas Niles, Tom Moldvay, and David “Zeb” Cook. Cook co-wrote X1 The Isle of Dread (sandbox Lost World
joy) and the excellent OA1 Swords of the
Daimyo (necessary for running Oriental Adventures in its original
incarnation, really). OA4 Blood of the
Yakuza and WGA4 Vecna Lives! certainly
have their partisans, too. I have particular affection for his DS1 Freedom, the first D&D adventure
I ever properly ran – quite railroad-y, but not wholly, and beautifully
imagined. My players loved it. Cook’s strength is relative breadth – 5 1e/2e
modules of real interest – but his weakness is the patchy quality. (ADDENDUM: His best, as I am reminded by a reader, is actually I1 Dwellers of the Forbidden City, an exotic pulpy location-based adventure with snakemen and frogmen and all kinds of craziness.)
Moldvay also co-wrote X1,
but really gets here on the Gothic strains of X2 Castle Amber and the gonzo oddities of B4 The Lost City – definitely an original and interesting designer.
Niles was incredibly proficient – and certainly some people have time for his H1-4 Bloodstone Pass series (I’m less
convinced as of now). But he has two surpassing modules – N1 Against the Cult of the Reptile God, a perfectly tuned “village
adventure”-cum-mystery which turns into a classic dungeon crawl; and B5 Horror on the Hill¸ the ultimate
refinement of B1 and B2, taking the best of both and turning
them into a coherent and complete module. Niles’ great achievement was the
polishing up of previous formats to their ultimate form.
The second batch of Hon Menshes is for a representative
group of “third party” designers, chiefly of the New Old School, sounding like
a circus troupe: Jaquays and Gus and Gavin and Kutalik and Patrick and Patrick. Jaquays wrote somewhat for TSR – both adventures and
sourcebooks – but really this Mensh is for Caverns
of Thracia and The Dark Tower. Caverns is deep and dense and dark and
also wondrous, and Dark Tower is
atmospheric as bliminey. Gus L has just written a lot of interesting, usually
small, adventures – he offers both sheer breadth, but also a bunch of weird and
wonderful contexts, particularly for Anomalous
Subsurface Environment...on which note, Patrick #1 (Wetmore) hasn’t written
much, and hasn’t published for a long time (we’re waiting on ASE4-5, dude! Force
playtest!), but Anomalous Subsurface
Environment (3 modules over 2 books) is an incredible setting, with a great
megadungeon and a “home city” which serves as its own great adventure setting.
The Other Patrick (Stuart) is great for writing fresh and weird stuff (even
Fresher and Weirder than Gus or Wetmore). Maze
of the Blue Medusa, Deep Carbon
Observatory, and Silent Titans
are all very different, all very weird, all very compelling – though sometimes
suffer from usability issues (even in DCO
Remastered).
The other two members of this group, like Wetmore, are
basically (not wholly) One Setting Men. Chris Kutalik has written the various Hill Cantons modules (Slumbering Ursine Dunes, Fever-Dreaming
Marlinko, Misty Isles of the Eld¸ and What
Ho! Frog Demons, plus the sort-of-module Tree Maze of the Twisted Druid) – acid fantasy with a lot of
organic comedy, a funky setting, great “escalation” mechanics, where if you
cause chaos, magical chaos is sure to follow. Kutalik has five good modules –
so he has some breadth – and he’s somewhat innovative with his escalation
mechanics. There’s definitely depth, too. He just misses the higher tiers by a
whisker.
Gavin Norman is the
editor of the premiere Basic D&D retroclone, Old School Essentials, but for our purposes is the co-author of the
Wormskin ‘zines (which include one full
adventure), and the associated standalone Dolmenwood adventures The Weird That Befell Drigbolton and Winter’s Daughter. He’s written a few other modules – most notably
the very good The Hole in the Oak –
but it’s on Dolmenwood his design reputation rests at this point. The zines are
full of gameable locales (that is, micro-adventures), and the adventures are
very varied – from a Timed Adventure in Drigbolton, to a traditional dungeon
crawl in the Abbey of St Clewd, to an
odd but great hybrid of settings and moods in Winter’s Daughter. Gavin is an expert on depth, being very very
good at realizing a setting in different modulations over his ‘zines and
modules.
The final group of Hon Menshs is the “Uh, Somewhat Qualified
Mentions”: Tracy Hickman, James Raggi, and Chris Perkins. I honestly believe all three men belong on this list
(as, perhaps, does Tracy’s regular collaborator, his wife Laura) – but I think
they all need whopping qualifications.
Hickman has originality, for good and bad, on his side – the
dungeon plotting in DL1 Dragons of
Despair and I6 Ravenloft is
groundbreaking. He could write solid adventures – I3 Pharaoh and Ravenloft are
both broadly very interesting modules. (Some like B7 Rahasia too.) But his influence on D&D adventure design was
largely malign – even DL1 is pretty
much a “dramatic” railroad, let alone the rest of that series, and Ravenloft has some of the same problems.
His two most famous modules are archetypal of the decadence-turning-to-rot of
mid-80s TSR.
Raggi has designed a number of interesting or compelling
modules – Tower of the Stargazer, Better Than Any Man, Death Frost Doom, and The God That Crawls,
amongst others, depending on taste – but that word, taste, really is key.
Even the easiest of these modules – Stargazer
– is at points perhaps rougher and crueller than many quite ruthless DMs will
want. The others are often heavy on world-changing events, escalation
mechanics, and Frankly Nasty Stuff. There’s definitely an acquired taste here.
Finally, Chris Perkins, Narrative Lead on Fifth Edition and
lead designer of most Fifth Edition modules. He’s been writing since Dragon took submissions from random kids
(like Chris Perkins!). He’s never written a categorical classic. Frankly, his
published output with Wizards is basically all too much long and bloated.
But...But...it’s basically actually quite interesting. It ranges from the solid
(Waterdeep: Dungeon of the Mad Mage,
an Undermountain reboot, or Curse of
Strahd, which has a bunch of good locations in a crappy campaign structure)
to the heavily dysfunctional but full of good stuff (Out of the Abyss, which flirts with brilliance in the Underdark, or
Storm King’s Thunder, which has a lot
of very usable setting stuff in a dysfunctional plot-driven campaign). At one
point, at least, he’s hit on Actually Really Good: long sections of Tomb of Annihilation (particularly in
the Tomb itself) are really very good. The caveats on Perkins are twofold: one,
that the modules are bloated and only half-usable; and two, that he is nearly
always leading a team of collaborators, so it’s hard to know which of the
brilliant bits are his and which aren’t. I would say, however, that his
influence on Fifth Edition design has been at worst “ambivalent” – perhaps Mearls
is the more important influence back to a more creative play style, but Perkins
is the one who’s done the heavy lifting on adventures throughout, and the
adventures are on the whole better than in Third or Fourth.
That’s it for the Noble But Distant Competitors. Next time,
we’ll move on to “The Pack” – the four (or eight, it’s complicated) designers
who run The Best close, in my view.
It’s tempting to give honourable mentions to just about every adventure designer who’s written anything I’ve liked. A number of excellent OSR designers fall short of this list by dint of small output (being normal people with busy lives), rather than by lack of quality. But who makes the “long list”?
I'm surprised Jaquays doesn't make it further. Hickman is more positive than not, I think, or at least I like Pharaoh a lot. OSR stuff, I'm not qualified to judge, it's not my cup of tea. Perkins is just recycling old stuff, he puts way too much silliness everywhere and yes he has a big team behind him (I think it's Will Doyle that has done the heavy lifting on the Tomb of Annihilation, the dungeon itself).
ReplyDeleteI'm intrigued by your next round!
I'm half-way through writing the next one, should be finished today. I just don't think Jaquays has the breadth - the TSR work isn't that exciting, so really it rests on two modules.
DeleteHickman definitely more positive than not. Pharaoh and Ravenloft are basically both very good, and DL1 has some really interesting elements, including its core dungeon. I think the collapse to narrative-centred adventures would have happened without him (and Laura) - it's incipient in later entries in the B series, it's part of a whole mindset associated with the "Skip Williams-isation" of TSR, etc.
Perkins is even very silly in his early Dungeon articles, but I think his design leadership can and ought to be associated with a positive move in Wizards circles - towards more open adventures, map-based exploration, etc. Maybe I'm just using him as an avatar of a small, qualified bit of good news. (As I say, maybe directionally I should credit Mearls more, who was plainly a good influence during the strange 4e era.)
Fair enough!
Delete